Your form has been submitted. We'll contact you in 24 hours.
Close
Home/Blog/Wireless proxy dropout rate test: Which performs better, 711Proxy or PyProxy?
Wireless proxy dropout rate test: Which performs better, 711Proxy or PyProxy?
PYPROXY·Sep 22, 2025
When it comes to selecting a reliable proxy service, understanding how they perform under real-world conditions is essential. A key factor for most users is the proxy service's disconnection rate, especially for wireless proxies, as this directly impacts internet speed, stability, and overall performance. In this article, we will focus on the wireless proxy disconnection rate test, comparing two popular proxy providers: 711Proxy and PYPROXY. The goal is to assess which service performs better, considering factors like connection reliability, performance consistency, and potential challenges faced by users. By the end of this comparison, you will have a clearer idea of which proxy service is the right fit for your needs.
Understanding Wireless Proxy Disconnection Rate
Before diving into the comparison between 711Proxy and PyProxy, it’s important to understand what we mean by the "wireless proxy disconnection rate." This rate refers to the frequency at which a wireless proxy connection becomes unstable or fails, disrupting the user’s browsing or data transmission experience. A high disconnection rate can lead to slow speeds, interrupted service, and a frustrating experience for the user. As such, it is crucial for businesses or individuals relying on proxies to choose a provider with a low disconnection rate to ensure smooth and continuous service.
Several factors contribute to the disconnection rate of wireless proxies. These include:
1. Server Stability – A proxy server’s infrastructure plays a crucial role in maintaining a stable connection. A well-maintained server is less likely to experience outages.
2. Network Traffic – High network traffic can strain the proxy’s resources, leading to more frequent disconnections.
3. Geographical Location – Proxies that are located further away from the user’s physical location can experience higher latency, increasing the likelihood of disconnections.
4. Security Measures – Some proxies may implement aggressive security protocols that can cause connections to drop frequently, especially if there is a mismatch between security settings and the client’s network.
Performance of 711Proxy in Wireless Proxy Disconnection Rates
711Proxy has gained attention for offering a variety of proxy services, including wireless proxies. When evaluating its performance in terms of disconnection rate, it’s important to consider several aspects:
1. Server Availability – 711Proxy has a large number of servers, which helps reduce the load on any single server. This improves the chances of maintaining a stable connection. However, in some locations, users have reported occasional drops in connection, which could be due to server overload or maintenance issues.
2. Connection Stability – 711Proxy’s wireless proxies tend to perform well in terms of maintaining stable connections for extended periods. That said, there have been reports of connection failures when the servers are under heavy load, especially during peak usage times.
3. Geographical Factors – 711Proxy’s global server network is beneficial in terms of providing coverage across various regions. However, some users located far from their nearest server have experienced higher latency, leading to occasional disconnections.
4. Security Measures – 711Proxy has strong security protocols in place, which can sometimes cause connection issues, particularly when users attempt to bypass certain geo-restrictions or use the proxy for specific applications that require higher bandwidth.
Performance of PyProxy in Wireless Proxy Disconnection Rates
PyProxy is another major player in the wireless proxy market, and its performance in terms of disconnection rate warrants a detailed review:
1. Server Availability – Like 711Proxy, PyProxy boasts a diverse server network across various countries. This helps ensure users can always find a nearby server. However, some users have reported slower speeds or dropped connections in areas with limited server presence.
2. Connection Stability – Users have generally found PyProxy to be stable with relatively few disconnections, even during extended use. However, in highly congested networks, disconnections may still occur, especially when there is a lack of bandwidth or if multiple users are connected to the same server.
3. Geographical Factors – PyProxy also has a widespread server network. Nevertheless, like 711Proxy, users who are geographically distant from their servers may face challenges with high latency or occasional disconnections.
4. Security Measures – PyProxy’s security protocols are typically strong, but they don’t seem to impact the connection stability as much as 711Proxy’s security measures. This may result in fewer disconnections related to security settings, although some users have noted minor drops during high-traffic situations.
Key Comparison Between 711Proxy and PyProxy
Now that we’ve examined both services individually, let’s compare them in the following areas:
1. Disconnection Rate – Overall, PyProxy tends to have a slightly lower disconnection rate compared to 711Proxy. Users report fewer interruptions in their wireless connections with PyProxy, which is crucial for maintaining a smooth experience.
2. Server Quality – 711Proxy offers more server options, but some of these servers may experience issues under heavy traffic. PyProxy's servers, while slightly fewer in number, tend to maintain stability and offer consistent performance across different regions.
3. Connection Speed – Both providers offer decent connection speeds. However, users located in certain regions may experience slower speeds with 711Proxy, especially when there are server overloads. PyProxy’s connection speed tends to remain more stable, even under heavier loads.
4. Global Availability – 711Proxy has the edge when it comes to global availability, with a larger number of servers spread across various countries. This is an advantage for users who require access to proxies in multiple locations. However, the larger network does not always guarantee better performance, as seen with occasional disconnections in specific regions.
Conclusion: Which One Is Better?
Both 711Proxy and PyProxy offer competitive wireless proxy services with their unique strengths and weaknesses. However, after analyzing their performance in terms of disconnection rates and connection stability, PyProxy emerges as the better choice for users looking for reliability and lower disconnection rates. While 711Proxy may offer more options and slightly better geographical coverage, the stability and performance consistency of PyProxy make it a stronger contender for users who prioritize uninterrupted service.
Ultimately, your choice between 711Proxy and PyProxy will depend on your specific needs, including your location, the level of security you require, and the intensity of usage. However, for most users, PyProxy is likely to deliver the more reliable wireless proxy experience with fewer disruptions.
