Your form has been submitted. We'll contact you in 24 hours.
Close
Home/Blog/Which is more suitable for anti-blocking tasks: rotating 4G proxies or rotating datacenter proxies?
Which is more suitable for anti-blocking tasks: rotating 4G proxies or rotating datacenter proxies?
PYPROXY·Aug 19, 2025
When it comes to bypassing restrictions or anti-bot measures, proxies play an essential role. Among the various types of proxies, rotating 4G proxies and rotating datacenter proxies are two prominent options for tasks that involve anti-blocking techniques. While both offer advantages, they differ significantly in terms of reliability, security, and efficiency in handling anti-blocking tasks. This article will explore which of these proxies is more suitable for preventing IP blocking, a common problem faced by users in scraping, data collection, or other online activities that involve large-scale automated processes.
Overview of Rotating 4G Proxies
Rotating 4G proxies utilize real mobile IP addresses associated with cellular networks. These proxies rotate between different mobile IP addresses, making it difficult for websites to detect any suspicious activity. Their key feature is that they mimic real users because mobile networks are typically used by millions of individuals worldwide. These proxies are harder to block because they are often associated with legitimate mobile traffic.
In anti-blocking tasks, rotating 4G proxies offer better stealth due to their mobile IP addresses, which are less likely to be flagged by websites. Websites are generally less inclined to block mobile traffic because it represents real users, reducing the chances of triggering captchas or blocking measures.
Overview of Rotating Datacenter Proxies
Rotating datacenter proxies, on the other hand, come from data centers and are not tied to real mobile networks. These proxies often come from static IP addresses that are shared among several users or frequently rotated. While they are faster and more reliable for certain tasks, they tend to be easier to identify as proxies. Many websites can detect datacenter IPs and apply strict blocking measures, especially when large amounts of traffic come from a single IP or region.
In terms of anti-blocking tasks, datacenter proxies can be effective but might require additional measures to avoid detection. Since they are typically faster than mobile proxies, they are commonly used for scraping tasks that do not involve significant anti-blocking measures.
Key Differences in Anti-Blocking Effectiveness
1. IP Type: The most significant difference lies in the IPs used. Rotating 4G proxies use real mobile IP addresses, which blend in with legitimate mobile users. This makes them far more effective in bypassing anti-blocking mechanisms compared to rotating datacenter proxies, which are often flagged by websites due to their data center origins.
2. Detection Risk: 4G proxies are much harder to detect as proxies because mobile traffic is not typically monitored as closely as datacenter traffic. Websites are more likely to block datacenter IPs, especially when large-scale scraping or automation is involved. 4G proxies, on the other hand, are associated with actual phone numbers and mobile devices, making it much more difficult for websites to trace and block.
3. Reliability: In terms of speed and connection stability, datacenter proxies have the edge, offering faster speeds and a more stable connection for high-demand tasks. However, for tasks that require stealth and minimal risk of detection, 4G proxies are the better choice despite their slightly slower speeds.
4. Cost: Rotating 4G proxies tend to be more expensive due to the nature of their IP sources. Mobile networks are more complex and expensive to access, thus making 4G proxies more costly than datacenter proxies. For larger-scale tasks, cost considerations may drive users to opt for datacenter proxies.
Practical Scenarios for Anti-Blocking Tasks
1. Web Scraping and Data Mining: In scenarios where large volumes of data are being collected from websites, rotating 4G proxies provide a higher success rate in bypassing detection and blocks. Websites tend to monitor and block IP addresses that show patterns of automated behavior, which is common with datacenter proxies. However, with 4G proxies, the traffic looks like genuine user activity, significantly reducing the risk of getting blocked.
2. Social Media Automation: If the goal is to manage social media accounts, rotating 4G proxies provide better protection against blocks since social media platforms often have sophisticated systems that detect non-human activity. Rotating 4G proxies, which use real mobile numbers, mimic human users, making it harder for platforms to detect automation.
3. Market Research: Market research that involves scraping competitor websites or gathering price data can be performed with both rotating 4G and rotating datacenter proxies. However, for tasks that require a prolonged interaction with websites without raising red flags, 4G proxies are preferred due to their stealth capabilities.
Which Proxy is Best for Your Anti-Blocking Task?
Choosing between rotating 4G proxies and rotating datacenter proxies largely depends on the nature of your task and the importance of stealth versus speed. If you require high levels of security and are working on tasks where detection could lead to significant disruption (such as social media management, or web scraping with strict anti-bot measures), rotating 4G proxies are likely the best choice. They provide the highest level of anonymity and security, making them suitable for tasks that involve bypassing sophisticated anti-blocking mechanisms.
However, if speed and efficiency are your primary concerns, and the task does not require evading highly sophisticated detection systems, rotating datacenter proxies may be more suitable. They offer faster speeds and lower costs, making them ideal for large-scale data scraping or other tasks that do not involve complex blocking systems.
In conclusion, for tasks focused on evading blocks and remaining undetected, rotating 4G proxies outperform rotating datacenter proxies. They offer a higher level of stealth and are more difficult to block. However, datacenter proxies remain a viable option for certain high-speed tasks where detection is not a major concern.
