Product
arrow
Pricing
arrow
Resource
arrow
Use Cases
arrow
Locations
arrow
Help Center
arrow
Program
arrow
WhatsApp
WhatsApp
WhatsApp
Email
Email
Enterprise Service
Enterprise Service
menu
WhatsApp
WhatsApp
Email
Email
Enterprise Service
Enterprise Service
Submit
pyproxy Basic information
pyproxy Waiting for a reply
Your form has been submitted. We'll contact you in 24 hours.
Close
Home/ Blog/ Which is more stable, static proxies or dynamic web proxies? the test results reveal the answer

Which is more stable, static proxies or dynamic web proxies? the test results reveal the answer

PYPROXY PYPROXY · Nov 06, 2025

In today's rapidly evolving digital environment, proxies play an essential role in maintaining online privacy, security, and performance. Among the various types of proxies, static and dynamic web proxies are two of the most commonly discussed. But which one offers better stability? This article will dive into the core differences between static proxies and dynamic web proxies, based on real-world testing, to provide readers with a deeper understanding of their performance, security, and overall reliability.

Introduction: Static vs. Dynamic Proxy - Which is More Stable?

The increasing reliance on the internet for business operations, online shopping, and sensitive data transactions has highlighted the importance of using proxies. A proxy serves as an intermediary between a user's device and the internet, masking the user's actual IP address. There are two main types of proxies: static and dynamic web proxies. Both serve similar functions but have different structures and performance characteristics. Understanding which one is more stable can help users make informed decisions regarding their online privacy and performance needs.

Static Proxy is a type of proxy where the IP address remains the same for an extended period. These proxies offer consistent and predictable performance, making them suitable for applications that require stable, unchanging connections, such as accessing region-restricted content or conducting long-term scraping activities.

Dynamic Web Proxy, on the other hand, rotates IP addresses automatically. This means that every time the user connects to a service, a new IP address is assigned. Dynamic proxies offer more flexibility and are often used in scenarios where anonymity and high levels of security are a priority. However, the constant switching of IPs can lead to potential performance inconsistencies.

The real question is: which one is more stable in terms of performance and reliability? To answer that, we need to explore both proxies in greater depth.

1. Static Proxy: An Overview of Stability

Static proxies offer stability primarily due to their constant IP address. This fixed IP model comes with distinct advantages that contribute to overall stability in terms of performance and accessibility.

1.1 Predictable Connection and Reduced Downtime

Static proxies are less prone to disruption since the same IP address is used throughout the session. This ensures a stable and reliable connection, with less chance of unexpected disconnects, making them suitable for long-term tasks such as scraping or data aggregation.

1.2 Long-Term Usability

Since the IP address doesn't change, static proxies are preferred for tasks that require consistent access to services or websites. This long-term reliability is critical for businesses or services that need uninterrupted access to specific online resources.

1.3 Lower Risk of IP Blocking

With static proxies, the risk of getting blocked is relatively low compared to dynamic proxies. Static IP addresses are less likely to be flagged by websites, as they are consistently used by the same user. However, this advantage comes with the caveat that if a specific static IP gets blacklisted, it will affect all users who rely on that same IP.

2. Dynamic Web Proxy: The Flexibility Factor

Dynamic web proxies, in contrast, offer more flexibility but with some potential performance inconsistencies.

2.1 Rotation of IPs and Enhanced Security

One of the key benefits of dynamic proxies is the ability to rotate IP addresses regularly. This makes it harder for websites to track and block users, which is why dynamic proxies are preferred for anonymous browsing and activities requiring high levels of privacy, such as web scraping or bypassing geographical restrictions.

2.2 Potential for Unstable Connections

While dynamic proxies can provide a rotating IP, this flexibility can sometimes introduce instability in terms of connection reliability. The constant switching of IP addresses may cause brief disruptions in service, especially when websites attempt to connect the user to specific IP addresses or locations. Additionally, some websites may have mechanisms that detect and block users with frequently changing IP addresses.

2.3 Higher Risk of IP Blocks

Dynamic proxies, due to the constant change in IPs, are more vulnerable to IP bans compared to static proxies. Websites may flag a range of dynamic IPs if they detect suspicious activity, which could result in a temporary or permanent block. While rotating IPs helps to mitigate this issue, it does not eliminate the risk entirely.

3. Real-World Testing: Comparing Stability

To determine the stability of static vs. dynamic proxies, we conducted real-world testing over a period of two weeks. The goal was to assess the performance and reliability of both types of proxies when used for common internet activities, including browsing, web scraping, and accessing region-locked content.

3.1 Testing Parameters

- Stability: Measured by the frequency of disconnections and interruptions during a continuous browsing session.

- Speed: Assessed by the time it takes to load websites and complete data scraping tasks.

- Security: Evaluated by how often IP addresses were flagged or blocked by websites.

3.2 Results

The results of the testing showed that static proxies had a higher stability rate in terms of connection reliability. During the test period, there were fewer instances of IP disconnections or service interruptions with static proxies. The speed of browsing and data scraping was consistent, and security risks were minimal, though occasional blocks were observed due to the static nature of the IP addresses.

In contrast, dynamic proxies experienced more frequent service disruptions and slower speeds due to IP rotations. The constant switching of IPs caused some delays when accessing certain websites or performing web scraping tasks. However, the security aspect of dynamic proxies was superior, with fewer instances of IP blocking or detection.

4. Conclusion: Which Proxy is More Stable? A Balanced View

After conducting the tests, it is clear that static proxies tend to offer more stable connections, with fewer interruptions and a more consistent experience. However, they come with a higher risk of IP blocking if the proxy ip is flagged by websites.

On the other hand, dynamic web proxies provide greater security and anonymity by rotating IPs regularly. While they are prone to occasional disruptions, their ability to avoid detection makes them a strong choice for users prioritizing privacy and security over absolute connection stability.

For users looking for long-term stability, static proxies are the better option. But for those in need of dynamic security and flexibility, especially when web scraping or bypassing geo-restrictions, dynamic proxies may be the better choice despite the occasional connection issues.

Ultimately, the best choice between static and dynamic proxies depends on the specific needs of the user and the trade-offs they are willing to make in terms of stability, security, and performance.

By understanding the strengths and weaknesses of both static and dynamic proxies, users can select the solution that best fits their needs for privacy, stability, and overall performance.

Related Posts

Clicky