Product
Pricing
arrow
Get Proxies
arrow
Use Cases
arrow
Locations
arrow
Help Center
arrow
Program
arrow
Email
Enterprise Service
menu
Email
Enterprise Service
Submit
Basic information
Waiting for a reply
Your form has been submitted. We'll contact you in 24 hours.
Close
Home/ Blog/ What is the difference between Oxylabs Proxy and other proxy providers (e.g. Luminati, PYproxy)?

What is the difference between Oxylabs Proxy and other proxy providers (e.g. Luminati, PYproxy)?

PYPROXY PYPROXY · Jun 05, 2025

When it comes to selecting a proxy service provider, businesses and individuals have several options available. Among the most prominent names in the proxy market are Oxylabs, Luminati, and PYPROXY. While all three offer high-quality proxy solutions, there are key differences that distinguish them from each other. Oxylabs stands out with its vast proxy pool, exceptional customer service, and advanced features tailored for data scraping and web crawling. On the other hand, Luminati is recognized for its large-scale residential proxy network, and PYproxy offers a different set of advantages focused on speed and reliability. In this article, we will dive deeper into the distinctions between these providers, exploring their features, pricing, and use cases.

1. Proxy Pool Size and Variety

One of the most significant differences between Oxylabs and other proxy service providers is the size and diversity of their proxy pool. Oxylabs boasts an extensive network, including both residential and data center proxies, enabling users to access a wide range of IP addresses worldwide. This ensures greater coverage and flexibility for different tasks such as web scraping, data gathering, or anonymous browsing.

Luminati, now known as Bright Data, has a massive residential proxy pool, offering over 72 million IP addresses globally. This is one of the largest networks available, making it ideal for businesses requiring a vast number of proxies for large-scale web scraping or market research. While Luminati’s network is impressive, it may be overkill for smaller businesses or those with limited proxy usage needs.

PYproxy, while also offering a decent selection of proxies, does not match the scale of Oxylabs or Luminati. However, it does provide competitive pricing and specializes in specific regions, which could be beneficial for businesses that only need proxies from certain countries or regions.

2. Performance and Speed

Performance and speed are critical considerations when choosing a proxy provider, particularly for tasks like data scraping or accessing geo-restricted content. Oxylabs is known for providing high-quality, fast residential proxies that deliver low latency, making it suitable for time-sensitive operations.

Luminati’s proxy network also offers fast speeds, particularly for residential proxies. However, some users report that the speed can vary depending on the region and the number of concurrent connections. This can affect performance for large-scale scraping projects where reliability is crucial.

PYproxy, in contrast, tends to focus on delivering fast and reliable proxies with fewer fluctuations in performance. It is particularly advantageous for businesses seeking fast access to specific websites without the need for a massive proxy network. However, PYproxy may not be suitable for larger-scale scraping due to its limited pool size and regional availability.

3. Customer Support and Service

Customer support is another area where Oxylabs shines. The company offers 24/7 customer support with a knowledgeable team that can assist with any issues related to proxy usage, setup, and troubleshooting. Additionally, Oxylabs provides extensive documentation and educational resources to help customers optimize their usage of proxies.

Luminati, while offering good customer support, has received mixed reviews regarding response times and the clarity of their assistance. Customers may experience longer wait times due to the large volume of clients using their services. However, Luminati does provide a comprehensive knowledge base and a dedicated account manager for enterprise customers.

PYproxy's customer support is generally responsive, but it may not be as robust as Oxylabs’ service. PYproxy tends to focus more on offering quick solutions for smaller-scale operations, so large enterprises or customers requiring round-the-clock assistance might find its service lacking.

4. Pricing and Cost Efficiency

Pricing is often a deciding factor when choosing a proxy service provider. Oxylabs offers a flexible pricing model that caters to businesses of various sizes, though its services are generally on the more expensive side. However, the cost is justified by the quality and reliability of their proxies, making it a preferred choice for enterprises that need high-performance proxies.

Luminati’s pricing is also on the higher end of the spectrum, especially considering the scale of their network. However, their large proxy pool can offer significant value for businesses that require proxies in bulk. Luminati offers different pricing plans based on usage, which can be beneficial for larger organizations but might be too costly for smaller businesses.

PYproxy is often considered the most cost-effective option among the three. With competitive pricing and straightforward plans, PYproxy is an attractive option for small businesses or individuals who require proxies for lighter tasks. However, the lower price may come at the cost of performance and scale compared to Oxylabs and Luminati.

5. Use Cases and Ideal Customers

Each proxy provider is suited for different types of users and use cases. Oxylabs is ideal for businesses that need a comprehensive, reliable solution for large-scale web scraping, data extraction, or SEO monitoring. Its diverse proxy pool and advanced features, such as rotating IPs, make it suitable for enterprises that require high-level anonymity and performance.

Luminati is the best choice for large enterprises that need access to a vast array of residential IPs for diverse and complex web scraping tasks. Its global network is perfect for market research, e-commerce monitoring, and competitive analysis, where data collection from various regions is necessary.

PYproxy, with its affordable pricing and focus on speed and reliability, is perfect for small to medium-sized businesses or individuals who require proxies for specific tasks like bypassing geo-restrictions or accessing websites quickly. Its regional proxies make it a great choice for businesses with localized needs.

6. Security and Anonymity

Security and anonymity are essential aspects of proxy services. Oxylabs emphasizes secure and anonymous connections, with advanced features like rotating residential proxies and IP whitelisting to prevent tracking. Its focus on security makes it a great choice for users who require high anonymity for web scraping or accessing sensitive content.

Luminati also prioritizes security and anonymity, offering advanced encryption and a variety of IP rotation techniques. However, some users report occasional issues with proxy anonymity, particularly when using shared IPs.

PYproxy focuses on providing reliable proxies for general web browsing and bypassing geo-blocks. While it offers good security, it may not be as robust as Oxylabs or Luminati, particularly for customers with strict security requirements.

In conclusion, the choice between Oxylabs, Luminati, and PYproxy depends largely on the specific needs and scale of the business or individual. Oxylabs is best suited for large enterprises requiring a versatile and high-performance proxy network with excellent customer support. Luminati is ideal for businesses with vast proxy needs, especially those in need of a global reach for web scraping and data collection. PYproxy, with its affordability and regional focus, is a great option for smaller businesses or individuals with more specific proxy requirements. Ultimately, the decision should be based on the required proxy scale, performance, budget, and customer service needs.

Related Posts

Clicky