Product
arrow
Pricing
arrow
Resource
arrow
Use Cases
arrow
Locations
arrow
Help Center
arrow
Program
arrow
WhatsApp
WhatsApp
WhatsApp
Email
Email
Enterprise Service
Enterprise Service
menu
WhatsApp
WhatsApp
Email
Email
Enterprise Service
Enterprise Service
Submit
pyproxy Basic information
pyproxy Waiting for a reply
Your form has been submitted. We'll contact you in 24 hours.
Close
Home/ Blog/ What are the differences between pyproxy proxies and oxylabs proxies in terms of global coverage?

What are the differences between pyproxy proxies and oxylabs proxies in terms of global coverage?

PYPROXY PYPROXY · Aug 11, 2025

In today’s digital world, the use of proxies has become essential for individuals and businesses that need to maintain anonymity, bypass geo-restrictions, or gather data efficiently. Two notable proxy service providers are PYPROXY and Oxylabs, both offering proxy solutions with extensive global reach. However, their global coverage varies significantly in terms of the number of locations, types of proxies offered, and service quality. In this article, we will explore the differences between PyProxy proxies and Oxylabs proxies, focusing on their global coverage. This analysis will help customers make an informed decision about which proxy service best suits their needs.

Understanding PyProxy Proxies

PyProxy is known for its large proxy pool, offering a variety of proxy types including residential, data center, and mobile proxies. PyProxy aims to provide high availability and fast speeds across a wide range of countries, making it a suitable option for users who require consistent access to international websites.

Global Coverage of PyProxy Proxies

PyProxy’s global coverage spans numerous countries, with a focus on popular regions such as North America, Europe, and Asia. It boasts over 100 countries with thousands of IP addresses spread across these regions, enabling users to access content from almost every corner of the globe. The proxies provided are primarily residential, meaning they are sourced from real devices, which helps to mask the user’s real IP address and makes the traffic appear more natural to websites. This is especially beneficial for web scraping, data collection, or bypassing geo-blocked content.

However, the coverage in certain regions such as Africa or parts of South America may be more limited compared to other services. While PyProxy is competitive in mainstream locations, the density of proxy servers in less popular regions may be sparse, leading to slower speeds or connection issues for users in these areas.

Understanding Oxylabs Proxies

Oxylabs is a prominent provider in the proxy industry, offering a wide range of proxy services, including residential, data center, and even next-generation mobile proxies. Oxylabs stands out due to its vast network and sophisticated technologies aimed at maintaining high speeds and reliability, even in regions where proxies can be harder to access.

Global Coverage of Oxylabs Proxies

Oxylabs boasts one of the largest proxy networks in the industry, with coverage extending to over 190 countries. Unlike PyProxy, Oxylabs has a more extensive reach, providing over 100 million residential IPs. The company also has high-quality data center proxies in more than 30 countries. Their proxy pool includes a wide distribution across both popular and less common regions, making them an excellent choice for businesses with international needs.

One of Oxylabs’ strengths is its consistent global availability. The proxies are spread across multiple continents, ensuring that users in regions such as Africa, South America, and Oceania also experience reliable speeds. The service guarantees low latency and high success rates, even when accessing websites or services in countries with restrictive internet policies.

Key Differences in Global Coverage

The major difference between PyProxy and Oxylabs lies in their global reach and availability in various regions.

1. Number of Countries Covered:

PyProxy covers over 100 countries, which is quite substantial for general use. However, Oxylabs covers more than 190 countries, providing a significantly broader geographical footprint. This makes Oxylabs a more reliable choice for businesses or individuals looking to access proxies from niche markets.

2. Proxy Pool Size and Distribution:

PyProxy offers a solid pool of residential and data center proxies, but its distribution is slightly more concentrated in North America and Europe. Oxylabs, on the other hand, has a much larger pool, with over 100 million residential IPs and widespread data center coverage across many countries. This allows Oxylabs to deliver more consistent and high-performing services in more diverse regions, including emerging markets.

3. Coverage in Emerging and Remote Regions:

While PyProxy does offer proxies in Africa and South America, the coverage tends to be less dense compared to Oxylabs. Oxylabs excels in these regions by providing more reliable and faster proxies due to its extensive network and diverse infrastructure.

4. Reliability and Speed:

Oxylabs generally outperforms PyProxy in terms of speed and reliability across global regions. The company uses advanced technology to ensure that proxies are not only available in a variety of countries but also offer consistent performance. PyProxy, though reliable in its primary regions, may not provide the same level of service in remote locations or during peak demand periods.

Which Proxy Service Is Better for Global Coverage?

The choice between PyProxy and Oxylabs will depend largely on the specific needs of the user.

- PyProxy is a solid option for those who need proxy services in mainstream locations like North America, Europe, and parts of Asia. It’s a good choice for web scraping, social media automation, or bypassing geo-restrictions in these well-covered regions. However, users in less popular regions may experience slower speeds or limited access.

- Oxylabs, on the other hand, is ideal for users who require a truly global proxy network. With extensive coverage across almost every country and a large pool of residential and data center proxies, Oxylabs is the better option for businesses with international data collection or content access needs. It excels in emerging markets, offering high-speed and reliable connections, even in regions where proxies are traditionally hard to find.

Conclusion

Both PyProxy and Oxylabs offer extensive global proxy coverage, but Oxylabs stands out due to its wider reach, larger proxy pool, and more reliable service in emerging markets. For users looking for robust global access, Oxylabs is the clear winner. However, for those whose needs are limited to popular regions like North America or Europe, PyProxy remains a strong contender. By understanding the strengths and limitations of each provider, businesses and individuals can make an informed decision based on their specific requirements.

Related Posts

Clicky