Product
arrow
Pricing
arrow
Resource
arrow
Use Cases
arrow
Locations
arrow
Help Center
arrow
Program
arrow
WhatsApp
WhatsApp
WhatsApp
Email
Email
Enterprise Service
Enterprise Service
menu
WhatsApp
WhatsApp
Email
Email
Enterprise Service
Enterprise Service
Submit
pyproxy Basic information
pyproxy Waiting for a reply
Your form has been submitted. We'll contact you in 24 hours.
Close
Home/ Blog/ Static proxy ip pool size comparison: which has more, pyproxy or yts proxy?

Static proxy ip pool size comparison: which has more, pyproxy or yts proxy?

PYPROXY PYPROXY · Nov 03, 2025

When evaluating static proxy services, one of the most important factors for users is the size of the IP pool. static proxies offer dedicated IPs that remain consistent over time, which is essential for activities like web scraping, accessing geo-restricted content, or maintaining anonymity in business operations. In this article, we will compare two prominent static proxy services: PYPROXY and YTS Proxy. Specifically, we will focus on the size of their IP pools, which plays a crucial role in the effectiveness and reliability of the service. A larger IP pool often translates to better scalability, reduced risk of bans, and enhanced privacy protection. Let’s dive deeper into this comparison.

Understanding Static proxy ip Pools

Static proxies are different from residential or data center proxies in that they provide dedicated IP addresses that don’t change frequently. This means that the same IP is assigned to the user over a longer period, allowing for consistency in online activities. The size of a proxy IP pool refers to the total number of unique IPs available for use within the service. A larger IP pool ensures greater diversity and availability of IPs, which can help prevent issues like IP blocking or detection.

A proxy provider with a large IP pool offers more flexibility and efficiency, especially when a user needs to conduct large-scale operations like web scraping, automated testing, or social media management. Having a broad range of IPs ensures that there are enough resources available to handle demand without performance degradation.

PyProxy: Features and IP Pool Size

PyProxy is known for providing static proxies that cater to various use cases, including browsing, scraping, and automation. It boasts a relatively large IP pool, ensuring that users have access to a wide range of IP addresses. PyProxy's IP pool consists of proxies located in multiple countries and regions, offering excellent geo-targeting capabilities for users who need to access region-specific content.

One of PyProxy’s strengths is its highly customizable options. Users can choose from different proxy types based on their needs, whether it’s a rotating IP pool or static IPs for specific tasks. The static proxy IP pool is ideal for those looking for long-term stability in their connections, such as in SEO campaigns, online research, or automation tasks that require persistent IP addresses.

YTS Proxy: Features and IP Pool Size

YTS Proxy also offers static proxies, with a focus on providing secure and anonymous browsing. While it may not have the same widespread recognition as some other proxy providers, it still offers a substantial IP pool. YTS Proxy’s IP pool is well-distributed across various locations globally, making it suitable for those who need to access region-restricted websites or perform location-based tasks.

The size of YTS Proxy’s IP pool is slightly smaller compared to PyProxy’s, but it still provides sufficient resources for typical business and personal use. YTS Proxy also emphasizes privacy and security, offering additional layers of encryption for users who require heightened anonymity. For smaller operations or those just starting with static proxies, YTS Proxy’s IP pool can be adequate, though users may face limitations in scalability as their needs grow.

Comparing IP Pool Sizes: PyProxy vs YTS Proxy

When it comes to the sheer size of the IP pool, PyProxy stands out as the larger provider. PyProxy’s IP pool is expansive, with thousands of IP addresses available across a variety of regions. This makes it an ideal choice for businesses or individuals with large-scale needs, such as scraping big datasets or running multiple automated tasks simultaneously.

On the other hand, YTS Proxy offers a more modest IP pool, which may be more than sufficient for smaller-scale operations. It is a viable choice for personal users or businesses with limited proxy needs. However, the smaller IP pool may limit users in cases where they require more concurrent connections or need to access a broader set of geo-locations.

Performance and Scalability: Which Proxy is Better for You?

While the size of the IP pool is an important consideration, it’s not the only factor to evaluate when choosing between PyProxy and YTS Proxy. Performance and scalability are equally critical, as having a larger IP pool is of little value if the service cannot handle your demand effectively.

PyProxy excels in both scalability and performance due to its larger IP pool and ability to support high concurrency. If your activities involve frequent switching of IPs or handling high traffic, PyProxy’s robust infrastructure can provide the performance needed without downtime or slowdowns.

YTS Proxy, while offering a smaller pool, still provides stable and secure connections. However, users with increasing demands might find themselves running into limitations. YTS Proxy works well for less intensive use cases or for businesses just getting started with proxies.

Use Cases and Client Needs

Different users will have different needs when it comes to static proxy services. For businesses requiring high scalability and low risk of detection, PyProxy is the better option. Its large IP pool ensures that users have the resources needed to handle intensive tasks, such as large-scale web scraping, SEO, or online data analysis.

On the other hand, YTS Proxy may be more suitable for smaller businesses or individual users who need a stable and secure proxy for personal browsing or light web scraping. The smaller IP pool is adequate for these use cases, and the service’s privacy features make it a strong contender for users focused on anonymity and security.

In conclusion, the choice between PyProxy and YTS Proxy ultimately depends on the user’s specific requirements. PyProxy offers a significantly larger IP pool, making it the better choice for businesses or individuals with large-scale operations or those needing access to a wide variety of geo-locations. YTS Proxy, with its smaller IP pool, is more suited for personal use or smaller-scale operations. Both services provide strong performance, but PyProxy shines in scalability and handling high-demand tasks.

For anyone looking to make an informed decision, it’s essential to assess both the size of the IP pool and the overall needs of the business or personal project. In the end, PyProxy is the superior choice for users who prioritize a large and diverse IP pool, while YTS Proxy is a solid option for users who require a secure and stable service for more moderate needs.

Related Posts

Clicky