In the ever-evolving world of internet services, proxies have become a crucial tool for ensuring privacy, bypassing geographical restrictions, and maintaining a smooth browsing experience. Among the numerous types of proxies, static ip proxies have garnered significant attention due to their consistent performance and reliability. In this article, we will compare two popular proxy services: PYPROXY and 13377x Proxy, focusing on their stability when used with static IPs. By evaluating the key features, user experiences, and performance metrics, we aim to determine which of these services provides a more reliable and stable static IP experience. This comparison is valuable for users who prioritize uninterrupted access and dependability in their proxy services.
Static IP proxies are a type of proxy server that assign a fixed IP address to users. This means that the IP address remains constant throughout the session, unlike dynamic IPs, which change periodically. The use of static IPs is particularly important for tasks such as web scraping, managing multiple accounts on social media, or conducting any activity that requires consistent, uninterrupted access. In the context of proxies, stability refers to the proxy’s ability to provide consistent speed, reliability, and uptime without frequent disconnects or IP bans. Both PyProxy and 13377x Proxy claim to offer static IP services, but their stability and performance can vary significantly depending on a variety of factors.
PyProxy has built a solid reputation in the proxy service industry. It offers a range of services, including residential and datacenter proxies, but its static ip proxy services have been particularly popular among users who require consistency. The key features that set PyProxy apart from other proxy services are:
- Reliability: PyProxy emphasizes a high level of uptime and minimal downtime. The service ensures that its users can rely on their static IP addresses without experiencing significant interruptions. For users who need their static IP for crucial tasks like automation or online transactions, this reliability is essential.
- Speed: While PyProxy’s speed is generally praised, its performance can fluctuate depending on the region and network conditions. However, for users in regions where PyProxy has a strong infrastructure, speed tends to be stable and reliable.
- Ease of Setup: Setting up PyProxy is simple, with a user-friendly interface that guides users through the process of selecting the right static IP proxies for their needs. This accessibility makes PyProxy a popular choice for both beginners and experienced users.
- Security: PyProxy offers strong encryption and security protocols to ensure that users' data is protected when browsing the web. This makes it an attractive option for users who prioritize privacy and security.
13377x Proxy, on the other hand, is often associated with a more niche audience, primarily catering to users who require access to blocked content or need a reliable proxy for online anonymity. While 13377x Proxy does offer static IP services, its focus is primarily on anonymity and bypassing geo-restrictions, making it an attractive option for certain types of users. Key features include:

- Access to Restricted Content: 13377x Proxy is well known for its ability to bypass geographical content restrictions, making it a go-to choice for users who need access to blocked or region-specific websites. While this is useful, it might not be as important for users seeking pure stability and consistency in their IP service.
- Performance Variability: One of the main drawbacks of 13377x Proxy is its inconsistent performance, particularly regarding speed. Users have reported instances of slowdowns or service interruptions, which can affect tasks that rely on stable and fast connections.
- Security: 13377x Proxy offers decent security measures, but it is not as robust as PyProxy in terms of encryption and data protection. For users who need a high level of security, this might be a limiting factor.
- Reliability: Stability is a concern for many 13377x Proxy users, especially when dealing with static IPs. The service can experience occasional downtime or connectivity issues, making it less reliable for long-term use compared to PyProxy.
While both PyProxy and 13377x Proxy offer static IP proxies, the core difference between these services lies in their stability and performance.
- Uptime and Consistency: PyProxy consistently offers higher uptime and more reliable connections. For users who need a stable static IP for continuous use, such as for automation or managing multiple online accounts, PyProxy tends to be the more reliable option. On the other hand, 13377x Proxy has been criticized for occasional service disruptions, making it less stable in long-term use.
- Speed: In terms of speed, PyProxy generally outperforms 13377x Proxy. Although 13377x Proxy might provide faster speeds for certain regions, users often experience slower speeds during peak usage times or when accessing certain sites. PyProxy’s infrastructure ensures faster and more consistent speeds across a wider range of locations.
- Customer Support: Another important aspect of stability is the level of customer support available. PyProxy offers better customer service, with quick response times and efficient troubleshooting for issues related to static IPs. In contrast, 13377x Proxy’s support can sometimes be slow or unresponsive, which can be frustrating for users experiencing technical issues.

To help users determine which proxy service is better suited to their needs, let’s explore several use cases.
- For Web Scraping and Automation: If your primary goal is web scraping or automating tasks that require uninterrupted access to specific websites, PyProxy is the superior option. Its higher stability and reliability make it the preferred choice for tasks that require consistent and fast connections.
- For Bypassing Geographical Restrictions: If your main concern is accessing region-locked content or bypassing restrictions on specific websites, 13377x Proxy might be a better choice. While its stability may not be on par with PyProxy, it excels in providing access to blocked content.
- For Privacy and Security: For users who prioritize security and data protection, PyProxy is the better choice. Its strong encryption protocols provide a higher level of privacy than 13377x Proxy, which may not be as secure in comparison.
When it comes to static IP proxies, PyProxy is the clear winner in terms of stability and overall performance. Its consistent uptime, faster speeds, and superior customer support make it the more reliable option for users who require a static IP for uninterrupted access. While 13377x Proxy has its advantages, particularly in bypassing geo-restrictions, its inconsistency in speed and occasional service disruptions make it less suitable for users seeking long-term reliability. Therefore, for those seeking the most stable static IP experience, PyProxy stands out as the better choice.