In the field of proxy technology, choosing a stable static ip proxy is crucial for ensuring secure, fast, and consistent network connections. Both PYPROXY and Rarbg Proxy are widely discussed solutions, but they differ significantly in architecture, performance, reliability, and application scope. This article provides an in-depth comparison from multiple dimensions such as connection stability, latency, IP persistence, security, and technical support. The goal is to help users identify which proxy solution is more suitable for long-term, professional, and business-critical usage.
A static IP is a fixed network address that remains unchanged during the entire connection period. Unlike dynamic IPs that change with each session, static IPs are ideal for tasks requiring continuity and identity consistency—such as data scraping, SEO monitoring, cross-border e-commerce management, and account operations.
Static IPs enable stable access to restricted platforms, reduce authentication interruptions, and allow long-term connections between client and server. Therefore, the stability of a static IP proxy directly affects the reliability of business systems and the efficiency of online tasks.
PyProxy is a professional proxy solution designed to provide users with high-quality IP resources through intelligent routing and automatic traffic balancing. Its core strength lies in its technical integration and performance optimization, making it suitable for users who prioritize connection reliability and flexible customization.
Rarbg Proxy, on the other hand, has been more popular in entertainment and lightweight network access scenarios. It focuses on ensuring accessibility for specific regions or services, but its stability and scalability are often limited compared to professional-grade proxy services.
Connection stability is the foundation of a good proxy. In this aspect, PyProxy demonstrates a significant advantage. It employs load balancing mechanisms and multi-node redundancy technology, allowing users to switch nodes automatically when one route becomes unstable. Test data from users show that PyProxy maintains uptime above 99%, making it ideal for continuous operations such as automation or monitoring.
Rarbg Proxy, in contrast, often experiences intermittent connection drops due to limited infrastructure and high dependency on public gateways. These issues lead to higher latency and lower availability, particularly under heavy traffic or regional restrictions.
Therefore, in terms of connection consistency and service continuity, PyProxy delivers a smoother and more dependable performance.
For many business users, maintaining the same IP throughout a session is essential to avoid account bans, CAPTCHAs, or session disruptions.

PyProxy offers long-term IP retention capabilities. Users can maintain static IPs for hours or even days without disconnection. This makes it particularly effective for use cases like cross-border login sessions, advertisement verification, or long-duration scraping.
Rarbg Proxy, however, typically relies on temporary IP allocation with shorter retention cycles. Its IPs often reset once a connection ends, leading to frequent IP changes that reduce reliability for professional applications.
From a session retention standpoint, PyProxy clearly holds a technical advantage.
Security is a non-negotiable element when selecting any proxy service. Both PyProxy and Rarbg Proxy provide encryption layers, but the degree and implementation differ.
PyProxy uses advanced encryption protocols and supports both HTTP and SOCKS5 frameworks, effectively preventing traffic interception and DNS leaks. It also integrates IP rotation protection to reduce traceability risks.
Rarbg Proxy, although providing basic encryption, lacks in-depth traffic isolation and may expose users to higher risks when used for sensitive business activities.
In professional or enterprise contexts, PyProxy’s multi-level encryption and authentication mechanisms offer significantly better security assurance.
Speed is a key indicator of user experience and operational efficiency.
Tests show that PyProxy’s optimized routing structure achieves an average latency of 60–90 milliseconds across international connections, while maintaining stable bandwidth output. This ensures consistent performance even during high-demand usage.
Rarbg Proxy, limited by its decentralized network structure, often displays fluctuating latency. Its average response time is around 150–250 milliseconds, which can cause lag or timeout errors during concurrent requests.
For users requiring real-time interaction or large-scale data processing, PyProxy’s speed advantage is clearly more competitive.
PyProxy offers flexible scalability. Enterprises can expand IP pools, customize regional routes, or deploy private nodes based on their operational needs. Its API integration allows developers to manage proxies programmatically, enhancing workflow automation.

Rarbg Proxy, being less enterprise-oriented, lacks robust scalability and customization features. Its support system is mostly community-based, which limits response efficiency for critical technical issues.
For organizations with long-term development goals or API-driven tasks, PyProxy is the more reliable option.
Pricing is always a key consideration. PyProxy may have a higher initial cost, but its performance stability, IP persistence, and technical support justify the investment, especially for businesses that require uninterrupted proxy performance.
Rarbg Proxy, while usually free or low-cost, comes with trade-offs—unpredictable uptime, slower speeds, and higher security risks. For short-term or non-critical tasks, it may suffice, but for professional usage, it becomes less cost-effective over time.
- For e-commerce or marketing professionals: PyProxy ensures continuous data collection and account management without IP interruptions.
- For developers or testers: Its API integration and IP persistence help maintain automation stability.
- For ordinary users or temporary access: Rarbg Proxy may be acceptable for simple browsing but not for commercial-scale workloads.
When evaluating both options based on stability, security, scalability, and real-world performance, PyProxy emerges as the more stable and professional-grade choice. Its strong uptime, long-term IP retention, advanced encryption, and enterprise support system make it ideal for users who require continuous, secure, and reliable proxy connections.
Rarbg Proxy, although accessible and lightweight, lacks the consistency and technical robustness demanded by business or data-driven environments.
In summary, for users seeking reliability, speed, and professional-grade stability, PyProxy is the superior option. For casual or short-term usage, Rarbg Proxy can still serve as a temporary alternative—but it cannot match the endurance and dependability of PyProxy in the long run.