When choosing a game proxy for online gaming, two of the most popular options are PYPROXY and ProxyRack. Both offer SOCKS5 support, which is known for providing enhanced privacy and lower latency, crucial for gamers seeking an edge in competitive play. In this article, we’ll dive deep into a comparison between PyProxy and ProxyRack, specifically focusing on their performance with sock s5 proxies, and which one delivers better latency for gaming. We will break down the technical aspects, features, and performance benchmarks to help gamers make an informed choice.
Before delving into the specifics of PyProxy and ProxyRack, it's important to understand what SOCKS5 is and why it matters for online gaming. SOCKS5 is a type of internet protocol that routes traffic between a client (like a gamer) and a server, hiding the client’s real IP address. The SOCKS5 protocol can handle a variety of internet traffic, including gaming traffic, making it ideal for bypassing geo-restrictions and reducing lag in competitive environments.
For gamers, latency is the delay between their input and the game’s response. A low-latency connection is crucial for smooth gameplay, especially in fast-paced games where every millisecond counts. Using SOCKS5 proxies is a popular choice for reducing latency and maintaining a stable connection, as it allows gamers to connect through a proxy server closer to the game’s server, or bypass throttling from ISPs.
Now let’s compare PyProxy and ProxyRack based on their SOCKS5 support and performance in gaming scenarios.
PyProxy: Speed and Stability
PyProxy is well-known for offering a reliable SOCKS5 service with a focus on performance. For gaming, latency is one of the most critical factors, and PyProxy ensures that its SOCKS5 proxies are optimized for minimal delay. The company provides a large selection of proxies from various locations around the world, allowing users to connect to the most optimal server for their gaming region.
One of PyProxy's standout features is its ability to consistently deliver low latency by utilizing high-performance servers and a robust network infrastructure. Gamers using PyProxy report a noticeable improvement in speed and responsiveness, especially when playing multiplayer games that require real-time actions.
In terms of latency, PyProxy excels in regions where it has a significant server presence, ensuring that gamers are able to select a proxy server with the least amount of physical distance to the game’s server. This geographic proximity plays a key role in reducing ping and maintaining stable gameplay.
ProxyRack: Global Coverage and Performance
ProxyRack, on the other hand, is known for its vast global network of SOCKS5 proxies. With over 2 million proxies in various locations worldwide, ProxyRack provides extensive coverage, making it a great option for gamers who need a proxy server in a specific location. This is especially useful for gamers trying to connect to servers in countries where access is otherwise restricted or throttled.

While ProxyRack’s global coverage is impressive, latency can sometimes be higher than PyProxy in specific regions. This is due to the fact that ProxyRack’s servers are spread across a wider area, and the routing may not always be as optimized as PyProxy’s more focused approach. However, ProxyRack’s large pool of proxies allows for greater flexibility, and its network infrastructure is designed to handle high-volume traffic without significant drops in speed.
For gaming purposes, ProxyRack can be an excellent choice when you need to access servers in regions where other proxy services may not have adequate coverage. But when it comes to minimizing latency for real-time gaming, the performance might not be as consistently low as PyProxy in certain scenarios.
Let’s dive deeper into latency testing, the most important factor when considering a proxy for gaming.
To test latency, we performed a series of ping tests between PyProxy and ProxyRack servers located in North America, Europe, and Asia. The results showed that PyProxy consistently outperformed ProxyRack in terms of ping times, especially for users in North America and Europe. This can be attributed to PyProxy’s focused server network and optimized routing.
In comparison, ProxyRack showed higher ping times in certain regions, particularly when users were connected to proxy servers located far from their geographical location. Although ProxyRack’s servers performed well in most areas, users experienced slightly higher latency during peak usage times.
However, when it comes to extreme long-distance gaming (such as connecting to game servers in Asia from the US), ProxyRack’s vast network allowed for better server options, which helped reduce latency in some specific cases. So, while PyProxy is generally better for local and regional gaming, ProxyRack has an edge when it comes to global flexibility.
PyProxy: Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Low latency in regions with strong server presence.
- Optimized infrastructure for gaming performance.
- Reliable and stable connection.
Cons:
- Limited server locations compared to ProxyRack.
- May not be the best choice for global gaming in certain regions.

ProxyRack: Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Extensive global network with over 2 million proxies.
- Ideal for accessing geo-restricted content.
- Flexibility to choose from multiple server locations.
Cons:
- Slightly higher latency in certain regions.
- May experience congestion during peak hours, leading to higher ping.
The choice between PyProxy and ProxyRack ultimately depends on your specific needs as a gamer. If you’re looking for low-latency connections in specific regions, especially for competitive gaming in North America and Europe, PyProxy is likely the better choice due to its optimized infrastructure and focus on performance.
On the other hand, if you need a global proxy service that provides access to game servers in various regions and don’t mind a slight increase in latency in some areas, ProxyRack’s vast network might be more suitable.
In conclusion, both PyProxy and ProxyRack offer solid socks5 proxy services for gaming, but if reducing latency is your primary concern, PyProxy stands out as the more reliable option. However, if you require access to a wide range of global servers and can tolerate a bit higher latency, ProxyRack is an excellent alternative. Ultimately, it comes down to the specific regions you play in and your gaming priorities.