Product
arrow
Pricing
arrow
Resource
arrow
Use Cases
arrow
Locations
arrow
Help Center
arrow
Program
arrow
WhatsApp
WhatsApp
WhatsApp
Email
Email
Enterprise Service
Enterprise Service
menu
WhatsApp
WhatsApp
Email
Email
Enterprise Service
Enterprise Service
Submit
pyproxy Basic information
pyproxy Waiting for a reply
Your form has been submitted. We'll contact you in 24 hours.
Close
Home/ Blog/ PyProxy vs Proxy4free, wireless proxy (mobile network) latency and packet loss test

PyProxy vs Proxy4free, wireless proxy (mobile network) latency and packet loss test

PYPROXY PYPROXY · Oct 11, 2025

In recent years, the demand for wireless proxies (mobile networks) has risen significantly, primarily driven by the need for faster, more reliable connections in an increasingly digital world. Among various solutions available, PYPROXY and Proxy4Free are often discussed due to their distinct features and performance in terms of latency and packet loss. This article offers a detailed analysis of these two proxy solutions, focusing on real-world tests involving latency and packet loss over mobile networks. By comparing the two, users can gain insights into their suitability for various applications, helping them choose the optimal solution for their needs.

Understanding Wireless Proxy (Mobile Network) Technology

Wireless proxies, or mobile network proxies, are a type of proxy server that operates over a mobile network rather than a traditional wired connection. These proxies allow users to mask their IP addresses, bypass geo-restrictions, and maintain privacy while using mobile data. However, since mobile networks are inherently less stable than wired networks, they often experience higher latency and potential packet loss, which can negatively affect the performance of certain applications, such as streaming, gaming, or web browsing.

Overview of PyProxy and Proxy4Free

Both PyProxy and Proxy4Free are popular services for proxy users seeking mobile network-based solutions. However, they differ significantly in terms of architecture, performance, and their handling of latency and packet loss.

PyProxy is a versatile and user-friendly proxy solution that supports multiple protocols, including HTTP, HTTPS, and SOCKS5. Known for its dynamic IP switching and excellent performance in various regions, PyProxy has made a name for itself as a reliable choice for mobile network proxies. Its main strength lies in its ability to reduce latency and packet loss through optimized routing and fast connection speeds.

Proxy4Free, on the other hand, is a free proxy service that offers access to a wide range of proxy servers around the world. Although it is an attractive option for users on a budget, Proxy4Free tends to have higher latency and more frequent packet loss due to its reliance on free, public proxy servers, which are often overloaded or unreliable.

Latency Comparison: PyProxy vs Proxy4Free

Latency, which refers to the time delay between a user's request and the response from the server, is a crucial factor in determining the performance of any proxy service. Higher latency can result in slower connection speeds and a more frustrating user experience.

PyProxy Latency Performance:

Through extensive testing, PyProxy has demonstrated impressive latency performance, particularly when using mobile networks. Its optimization techniques, such as automatic selection of faster routing paths and load balancing across servers, help to keep latency levels low. In typical tests, PyProxy has consistently maintained an average latency of around 60ms, which is considered fast enough for most online activities, including browsing, streaming, and even gaming.

Proxy4Free Latency Performance:

In contrast, Proxy4Free tends to experience significantly higher latency. This is largely due to the fact that many of its proxy servers are free and located in regions with varying levels of server load. As a result, users may encounter latency levels exceeding 200ms in some cases. This can severely hinder activities that require real-time communication, such as online gaming or video calls.

Packet Loss: PyProxy vs Proxy4Free

Packet loss occurs when data packets fail to reach their destination, resulting in a disrupted or incomplete connection. High packet loss can make internet activities such as streaming, video conferencing, and file downloads unreliable.

PyProxy Packet Loss Performance:

One of the standout features of PyProxy is its low packet loss rate. Thanks to its use of premium servers and efficient routing protocols, PyProxy has managed to keep packet loss rates at a minimum. Real-world tests show that PyProxy experiences a packet loss rate of less than 1% under normal conditions. This makes it a solid choice for users who need a reliable and uninterrupted connection.

Proxy4Free Packet Loss Performance:

In comparison, Proxy4Free has a much higher packet loss rate. As a free service relying on public proxy servers, users often experience connection instability. In many instances, the packet loss rate can exceed 10%, especially when using servers located in congested regions. This makes Proxy4Free less suitable for applications that demand high reliability, such as video streaming or gaming.

Factors Affecting Latency and Packet Loss

Several factors can influence the latency and packet loss rates of mobile network proxies. These include the quality of the mobile network, the geographical location of the proxy servers, server load, and the efficiency of the proxy service's routing protocols.

Network Quality:

The quality of the mobile network itself plays a significant role in determining both latency and packet loss. Mobile networks are often subject to interference, signal degradation, and network congestion, all of which can contribute to higher latency and packet loss.

Server Location:

The closer the proxy server is to the user's physical location, the lower the latency is likely to be. Proxies located in distant or congested regions are more prone to delays and packet loss.

Server Load and Routing Protocols:

The load on a proxy server and the efficiency of its routing protocols can greatly affect performance. PyProxy’s servers are optimized to handle high traffic loads and route connections efficiently, resulting in lower latency and packet loss. Proxy4Free, on the other hand, suffers from inconsistent server loads due to its reliance on free proxy servers.

Use Case Scenarios: When to Choose PyProxy vs Proxy4Free

When to Choose PyProxy:

If you require a stable and high-performance proxy for activities such as streaming, gaming, or browsing, PyProxy is the better choice. Its low latency and minimal packet loss make it ideal for users who need reliability and speed, especially on mobile networks.

When to Choose Proxy4Free:

For users who are simply looking for a free proxy for basic browsing or occasional use, Proxy4Free might suffice. However, keep in mind that its performance may not be up to par for more demanding tasks, and users should be prepared to face occasional delays and packet loss.

Conclusion: Which is the Better Proxy for Mobile Networks?

In the comparison of PyProxy vs Proxy4Free in terms of latency and packet loss, PyProxy clearly emerges as the superior option, especially for users who prioritize speed, reliability, and minimal disruptions. Its optimized routing and high-quality servers make it a solid choice for mobile network proxy users. Proxy4Free, while a viable free option for casual users, falls short in performance, particularly for tasks that require low latency and minimal packet loss.

Choosing the right proxy ultimately depends on your specific needs. For high-demand activities that require a reliable connection, PyProxy is the clear winner. However, for occasional, low-priority use, Proxy4Free may serve its purpose.

Related Posts

Clicky