Product
arrow
Pricing
arrow
Resource
arrow
Use Cases
arrow
Locations
arrow
Help Center
arrow
Program
arrow
WhatsApp
WhatsApp
WhatsApp
Email
Email
Enterprise Service
Enterprise Service
menu
WhatsApp
WhatsApp
Email
Email
Enterprise Service
Enterprise Service
Submit
pyproxy Basic information
pyproxy Waiting for a reply
Your form has been submitted. We'll contact you in 24 hours.
Close
Home/ Blog/ Pyproxy vs 13377x proxy: residential service ip access stability test comparison

Pyproxy vs 13377x proxy: residential service ip access stability test comparison

PYPROXY PYPROXY · Oct 29, 2025

The stability of residential IP services is crucial for various internet applications, especially for users who rely on proxies for privacy, security, and access to geo-restricted content. In this article, we will compare two proxy services, 13377x proxy and PYPROXY, focusing specifically on their residential IP access stability. residential proxies provide IPs assigned by ISPs to regular households, ensuring that users are less likely to be flagged or blocked. This comparison will delve into aspects such as reliability, connection stability, speed, and performance under different conditions to provide insights that are valuable for individuals and businesses seeking stable, secure, and efficient proxy services.

Introduction: Importance of residential proxy Stability

Residential proxies are increasingly popular for various use cases, such as web scraping, social media automation, and online privacy protection. However, not all residential proxy services offer the same level of stability. For businesses and individuals who rely on proxies to conduct high-volume or time-sensitive activities, the stability of the IP connection is a major concern. A proxy service with unstable connections could cause delays, result in data inconsistencies, and lead to blocked access, which could ultimately damage reputation and hinder operations.

The 13377x proxy and pyproxy services both promise high-quality residential IP access. However, their performance may vary, making it crucial to test and compare their stability under different conditions. In this comparison, we will examine these services based on reliability, connection speed, downtime frequency, and overall performance, giving users valuable insights into which service offers the most dependable residential IP solutions.

Reliability: Assessing Connection Consistency

Reliability is one of the most important factors when evaluating any proxy service. A proxy service should maintain consistent connections with minimal interruptions, ensuring that users can access their desired websites and services without disruption.

- 13377x proxy: This service uses a vast pool of residential IPs, providing users with stable and varied connections. However, users have reported occasional dips in reliability when switching between different IPs within the network. While this is not frequent, it is something to consider for users who require continuous, uninterrupted connections.

- pyproxy: In contrast, pyproxy has a reputation for providing very stable connections. With a well-maintained infrastructure and a consistent selection of residential IPs, users have generally reported fewer disruptions. The service is particularly reliable for long-term use, as it ensures minimal downtime even during high-demand periods.

Overall, pyproxy seems to have a slight edge in reliability, offering more stable connections over extended periods.

Connection Speed: Impact on Performance

Connection speed plays a significant role in the overall experience when using proxy services. Faster speeds ensure that users can perform their activities without noticeable delays, which is especially crucial for tasks such as browsing, media streaming, or data-intensive operations like scraping or running automated processes.

- 13377x proxy: 13377x proxy offers decent connection speeds, with most users experiencing acceptable performance for general browsing and occasional tasks. However, the speed can fluctuate depending on the residential IP pool assigned to the user. While many users report good performance, some have experienced slower speeds during peak times or when connecting to certain regions.

- pyproxy: pyproxy delivers more consistent speed across its network. Users report high-speed connections for a wide range of activities, from browsing to scraping and streaming. The service has more robust infrastructure, which supports faster speeds even under heavy load.

When comparing the two, pyproxy tends to outperform 13377x proxy in terms of consistent speed, making it a better option for users who need high-performance proxies for time-sensitive tasks.

Downtime and Availability: Assessing Service Uptime

The availability of a proxy service is vital for ensuring that users can always access the internet when they need it. Any downtime can significantly affect workflows, particularly for users who rely on proxies for business operations or sensitive tasks.

- 13377x proxy: This service has experienced occasional downtime, particularly during updates or maintenance periods. While these outages are typically brief, they can cause interruptions for users who need continuous access. 13377x proxy users should expect some downtime, particularly during high-demand periods.

- pyproxy: On the other hand, pyproxy boasts higher uptime and fewer interruptions. The service uses load balancing and other techniques to ensure that even during peak usage times, the proxies remain functional and available. This makes pyproxy a more reliable option for users who require uninterrupted access.

In terms of downtime, pyproxy outshines 13377x proxy by providing more consistent and uninterrupted service.

Performance under Heavy Load: Stress Testing the Services

For many businesses and advanced users, performance under heavy load is a crucial factor in choosing a proxy service. This is particularly relevant for tasks such as web scraping or handling large-scale automated activities that require simultaneous requests from multiple IPs.

- 13377x proxy: While 13377x proxy handles moderate loads well, users have noted performance drops when multiple simultaneous connections are made through the same IP pool. The proxy service can become slower as more users access the network, resulting in performance degradation under heavy load.

- pyproxy: pyproxy performs better under heavy load. The service uses a more advanced infrastructure that allows for greater scalability. As a result, users report fewer slowdowns or performance issues, even when accessing multiple websites or running complex automated tasks simultaneously.

For users who rely on proxies for large-scale tasks, pyproxy offers superior performance under heavy load conditions.

Security and Privacy: Protecting User Data

Both 13377x proxy and pyproxy offer residential IPs, which are known for their higher level of anonymity and lower risk of being flagged as suspicious by websites. However, security measures can vary between services, which may impact the overall user experience.

- 13377x proxy: 13377x proxy offers basic security features, including encryption and IP masking. However, it does not provide advanced security features such as rotating IPs or dedicated IP pools. While this may not be a major concern for casual users, it could be a limitation for users who require extra layers of protection.

- pyproxy: pyproxy has more advanced security protocols in place, including regular IP rotations and the use of dedicated IPs for specific tasks. The service is also more proactive in monitoring and mitigating potential risks to user privacy, offering an additional layer of protection compared to 13377x proxy.

For users concerned about security and privacy, pyproxy is the more secure option, providing stronger safeguards for sensitive online activities.

Conclusion: Which Proxy Service is Right for You?

Both 13377x proxy and pyproxy offer valuable residential IP services, but they cater to slightly different user needs. 13377x proxy provides a good service for users seeking affordable proxies with decent reliability and speed. However, it may not be the best choice for those who require consistent performance under heavy load or advanced security features.

pyproxy, on the other hand, offers superior reliability, speed, uptime, and security. It is a more suitable choice for users who need high-performance proxies for intensive tasks, such as web scraping or managing large-scale automated processes.

Ultimately, the choice between 13377x proxy and pyproxy depends on your specific requirements. If you prioritize stability, speed, and security, pyproxy is the better option. However, if you are looking for a budget-friendly solution with decent performance, 13377x proxy could still serve your needs effectively.

Related Posts

Clicky