Product
arrow
Pricing
arrow
Resource
arrow
Use Cases
arrow
Locations
arrow
Help Center
arrow
Program
arrow
WhatsApp
WhatsApp
WhatsApp
Email
Email
Enterprise Service
Enterprise Service
menu
WhatsApp
WhatsApp
Email
Email
Enterprise Service
Enterprise Service
Submit
pyproxy Basic information
pyproxy Waiting for a reply
Your form has been submitted. We'll contact you in 24 hours.
Close
Home/ Blog/ In long-term use of residential proxies, which has a lower risk of being blocked: PyProxy or Dichvusocksr?

In long-term use of residential proxies, which has a lower risk of being blocked: PyProxy or Dichvusocksr?

PYPROXY PYPROXY · Sep 24, 2025

When considering long-term use of residential proxies, the risk of being blocked is one of the most critical factors for any business or individual looking to maintain seamless access. PYPROXY and Dichvusocksr are two popular services that offer residential proxy solutions. However, their blocking risk profiles differ based on various factors such as their network design, user base, and security protocols. In this article, we will delve into the specifics of each service, comparing their features, and analyzing which one offers a lower risk of blocking in the context of long-term residential proxy usage.

Understanding Residential Proxies and Blocking Risks

Residential proxies are IP addresses provided by Internet Service Providers (ISPs) to homeowners. They are often used by businesses to avoid detection during web scraping, market research, or other automated online activities. However, with the increasing sophistication of anti-bot measures, residential proxies are at risk of being blocked or flagged by websites and services.

Blocking risks arise due to several factors, such as:

1. Reputation of IP Addresses: If many users access a specific proxy pool, websites may flag the IP addresses as suspicious, leading to frequent blocking.

2. Traffic Behavior: If a proxy service exhibits abnormal usage patterns (e.g., high volume of requests from one IP), this can trigger blocklists.

3. IP Pool Size: The larger the pool of residential IP addresses, the less likely it is that an individual IP will be flagged as suspicious.

In the case of PyProxy and Dichvusocksr, both providers offer residential proxies, but their risk profiles differ based on how they manage these and other factors.

PyProxy: Strengths and Weaknesses in Blocking Risk

Strengths:

1. Diverse IP Pool: PyProxy boasts a large and diverse pool of residential IP addresses, which significantly reduces the chances of an IP address being flagged. Since the proxies are sourced from a wide variety of ISPs, they are harder for websites to block or track.

2. rotating proxies: One key feature of PyProxy is its rotating proxy system. By constantly rotating IP addresses, users avoid sustained traffic from a single IP, reducing the likelihood of detection by anti-bot systems.

3. Geographical Distribution: PyProxy offers proxies in multiple geographic locations. The more varied the location of your proxies, the less likely they are to be blocked by region-specific restrictions or blacklists.

Weaknesses:

1. Shared IPs: In some cases, PyProxy uses shared residential IPs. These shared IPs might increase the likelihood of being flagged if other users engage in malicious or suspicious activity.

2. Possible Overuse: Although the large pool is beneficial, overuse by customers can lead to certain IP addresses being more frequently flagged, especially if users perform actions like high-frequency scraping.

Dichvusocksr: Strengths and Weaknesses in Blocking Risk

Strengths:

1. Premium Residential Proxies: Dichvusocksr specializes in providing high-quality, premium residential proxies. These proxies are often less likely to be flagged or blocked due to their higher quality and limited user base.

2. Enhanced Security Measures: Dichvusocksr incorporates advanced security measures like CAPTCHA-solving and IP fingerprinting techniques to bypass security systems and reduce blocking risks.

3. Smaller User Base: The relatively smaller user base of Dichvusocksr reduces the likelihood that many users will be simultaneously using the same IP address for similar activities, reducing the risk of flagging.

Weaknesses:

1. Limited Pool Size: Dichvusocksr, compared to PyProxy, has a smaller proxy pool. Although this can mean less risk of IP abuse, it also means that the available IPs are used more frequently, which could potentially lead to a higher risk of blocking over time.

2. Higher Cost: Because of the premium nature of their services, Dichvusocksr is generally more expensive than other services. This could deter small businesses or individual users from benefiting from the service, leaving them to resort to larger, more shared proxy pools that might increase the risk of blocking.

Comparative Analysis of PyProxy vs Dichvusocksr: Blocking Risk Evaluation

Now that we understand the individual strengths and weaknesses of both services, let's break down the comparison based on key factors that influence the blocking risk:

1. IP Rotation Mechanism: PyProxy excels in this aspect. Its continuous rotation of IPs reduces the risk of persistent blocks by ensuring that each request comes from a new IP address. Dichvusocksr, while also providing a reliable rotation mechanism, may not have the same level of automation or frequency of rotation, thus leading to a slightly higher risk of detection and blocking.

2. IP Pool Size: PyProxy’s large IP pool provides an obvious advantage. A diverse and vast pool of IP addresses ensures that your activities are spread out across multiple nodes, reducing the chances of triggering a block. Dichvusocksr’s smaller pool can lead to higher usage per IP, which increases the likelihood of encountering blocks, particularly for users engaging in high-volume activities.

3. IP Quality: Dichvusocksr has a clear advantage in terms of quality. Their premium IPs are less likely to be flagged because they are sourced from a controlled and verified environment, ensuring that only legitimate traffic is using them. PyProxy, while offering a large pool, does not guarantee the same level of IP quality, and users may face more frequent blockages if they happen to use IPs that are shared with other users or those previously flagged.

4. Geographical Distribution: Both services offer proxies in a variety of locations, but PyProxy tends to have a more extensive global reach. This can be crucial for bypassing geo-restrictions and reducing regional blockages. Dichvusocksr may have fewer locations available, but this doesn’t necessarily impact blocking risk unless users require proxies from specific regions.

Conclusion: Which Service Offers the Lower Blocking Risk?

When comparing the two services, PyProxy offers the most advantages in terms of reducing blocking risk for long-term residential proxy use. Its larger IP pool, continuous IP rotation, and broader geographical coverage give it a significant edge over Dichvusocksr in minimizing the chances of being blocked.

Related Posts

Clicky