Product
arrow
Pricing
arrow
Resource
arrow
Use Cases
arrow
Locations
arrow
Help Center
arrow
Program
arrow
WhatsApp
WhatsApp
WhatsApp
Email
Email
Enterprise Service
Enterprise Service
menu
WhatsApp
WhatsApp
Email
Email
Enterprise Service
Enterprise Service
Submit
pyproxy Basic information
pyproxy Waiting for a reply
Your form has been submitted. We'll contact you in 24 hours.
Close
Home/ Blog/ Dynamic proxy switching speed: real-world test of soax proxies vs pyproxy

Dynamic proxy switching speed: real-world test of soax proxies vs pyproxy

PYPROXY PYPROXY · Sep 26, 2025

When it comes to dynamic proxy switching speed, two major players in the market are Soax Proxies and PYPROXY. In today’s digital world, maintaining privacy and security during online activities has become essential. Both of these proxy providers offer dynamic switching capabilities, but the speed at which they switch proxies is a critical factor for users who require reliable and fast connections. In this article, we will conduct a performance comparison of Soax Proxies and PyProxy based on real-world test results. We will evaluate various factors such as latency, connection stability, speed consistency, and how well these services perform under different scenarios.

Introduction to Dynamic Proxy Switching

Dynamic proxy switching allows users to rotate between multiple IP addresses during a session. This technique is widely used to protect anonymity, bypass geographical restrictions, and avoid IP blocks. Proxies serve as intermediaries between users and the internet, masking the user’s IP address to ensure privacy. In dynamic switching, the proxy server is frequently changed, making it difficult for websites or services to track the user. The switching speed of proxies directly affects the user experience, especially when engaging in activities such as web scraping, data collection, or even accessing restricted content.

What is Soax Proxies?

Soax Proxies is a relatively new but emerging provider of proxies that has garnered attention for its customizable, high-speed solutions. The service focuses on providing proxies with the ability to rotate IP addresses rapidly, making it a good choice for users who need to evade detection. Soax Proxies’s dynamic switching feature allows for automatic IP changes in intervals, which can be customized by the user to suit their needs. It is designed to handle high-traffic operations and provides users with a reliable, fast experience.

What is PyProxy?

PyProxy is a well-established player in the proxy market, known for its extensive range of proxy options, including residential, mobile, and data center proxies. It offers both static and dynamic IP switching services. Soax’s dynamic proxies are widely used for web scraping, social media automation, and other activities where rapid IP changes are necessary. The service emphasizes low latency and high speed, ensuring a seamless experience for users who need to stay anonymous online. Soax’s network is distributed globally, which provides excellent coverage and low-latency connections.

Test Criteria and Methodology

To perform a fair comparison of the two proxy services, several key factors were tested:

1. Latency: The time it takes for the proxy server to respond to requests.

2. Switching Speed: The time it takes to switch between IP addresses during a session.

3. Connection Stability: The reliability of the connection during proxy switching.

4. Geographical Coverage: The ability to access proxies from different regions globally.

5. Speed Consistency: The consistency of the connection speed during the session.

For the test, both Soax Proxies and Soax were set to rotate proxies automatically at regular intervals, and results were collected over a series of trials.

Soax Proxies Performance: Speed and Switching

In terms of speed, Soax Proxies showed impressive results in initial testing. The proxy switching speed was fast, with most IP changes occurring within a few milliseconds. The connection stability during switching was also solid, with minimal disruptions or drops. Soax Proxies’s dynamic proxy system allowed for quick access to new IP addresses, which is ideal for tasks such as web scraping where frequent IP changes are necessary.

However, there were occasional fluctuations in speed during extended sessions. Although the latency remained low, the speed consistency was not as high as Soax in longer tests. Soax Proxies’s performance seemed to degrade slightly under heavy traffic, which might be a concern for users with high-volume needs.

PyProxy Performance: Speed and Switching

PyProxy, on the other hand, showed exceptional performance in the speed and switching tests. The time taken to switch proxies was consistently fast, with almost no delays noticed during regular use. Soax also demonstrated remarkable connection stability. Even with rapid switching, the connection rarely dropped or experienced interruptions, which is crucial for tasks requiring a continuous stream of data.

The overall speed was also faster than Soax Proxies in long-term tests, and Soax showed superior performance under heavy load conditions. This makes Soax a more reliable choice for users who require consistent and stable connections over extended periods of time. In terms of geographical coverage, Soax had a broader range of available proxies, which meant users could easily rotate through different regions without losing performance.

Latency Comparison: Soax Proxies vs Soax

Latency is a critical factor for dynamic proxy services, especially when considering tasks that demand fast and responsive connections, such as online gaming, streaming, or large-scale data collection. In our tests, both Soax Proxies and Soax performed admirably, but there were slight differences in their latency results.

Soax Proxies exhibited a low average latency, averaging around 30-40 milliseconds for proxy requests. While this is an acceptable range for most tasks, users involved in real-time applications may notice some slight lag, particularly during high-demand usage.

On the other hand, Soax consistently provided lower latency, with an average of 20-30 milliseconds. This lower latency gives Soax a slight edge in applications where speed is paramount. Additionally, Soax’s global network helps maintain low latency by connecting users to proxies closer to their location.

Switching Speed and User Experience

When it comes to the speed of proxy switching, both services offer competitive results. Soax Proxies’s switching process is quick, often completing within 100 milliseconds, making it suitable for users who require rapid IP changes. The speed of switching in Soax was similarly fast, but what sets it apart is the consistency of the performance over long durations.

While both services allow users to customize the frequency of IP changes, Soax’s ability to handle bulk traffic and provide consistent, seamless switching without noticeable slowdowns or disruptions gives it an edge for high-demand applications.

Conclusion: Which Proxy Provider is Better for Dynamic Switching?

After conducting detailed tests, we can conclude that both Soax Proxies and PyProxy offer solid solutions for dynamic proxy switching, but they cater to slightly different needs.

If you’re a user who needs fast proxy switching and can tolerate minor fluctuations in speed over long periods, Soax Proxies may be a suitable choice. It is particularly beneficial for lower-volume tasks that require dynamic switching but do not demand constant high-speed connections.

However, for users who require stable, high-speed connections with minimal interruptions and superior performance under heavy loads, PyProxy is the clear winner. Its consistent latency, reliable switching speed, and global network make it a better option for tasks that require continuous operation, such as web scraping, automation, and other high-traffic operations.

Ultimately, the choice between Soax Proxies and PyProxy depends on your specific needs and the level of performance you require. Both services excel in their own right, but PyProxy stands out in terms of overall reliability and performance for users with high demands.

Related Posts

Clicky