Your form has been submitted. We'll contact you in 24 hours.
Close
Home/Blog/Comparison of residential proxy services: real IP coverage of pyproxy vs usaproxy
Comparison of residential proxy services: real IP coverage of pyproxy vs usaproxy
PYPROXY·Oct 16, 2025
When it comes to residential proxy services, two major players stand out: PYPROXY and USAProxy. These services provide users with access to real residential IPs, which are crucial for various tasks like web scraping, online research, and data collection. One of the key factors in choosing a residential proxy service is the real IP coverage, which directly influences the effectiveness and reliability of the proxy network. This article compares PyProxy and USAProxy based on their real IP coverage, helping users make an informed decision based on their needs.
Understanding Residential Proxy Networks
Residential proxy networks rely on real IP addresses assigned by Internet Service Providers (ISPs) to homeowners and businesses. These IPs are highly valuable for certain activities because they look like normal user traffic, which reduces the risk of being flagged or banned by websites.
In contrast to data center proxies, which are hosted on centralized servers, residential proxies are distributed across a wide range of devices. This makes residential proxies appear more authentic to websites and services. For users looking for anonymity, geo-targeting, or avoiding IP blocks, residential proxy services are ideal.
However, not all residential proxy services are created equal. The quality of the proxy network, especially real IP coverage, varies from provider to provider. Let’s dive into how PyProxy and USAProxy perform in terms of real IP coverage.
Real IP Coverage: PyProxy vs USAProxy
Real IP coverage refers to the geographic distribution and volume of IP addresses available through a proxy service. The more widespread the network, the better the service can simulate real user activity. This is particularly important for tasks like web scraping, where diverse IP addresses from different regions can help avoid detection and IP bans.
PyProxy Real IP Coverage
PyProxy has carved out a solid reputation in the proxy market for its extensive range of real IP addresses. The service is known for offering proxies from multiple countries, ensuring a global reach. This is particularly useful for businesses and individuals involved in global data collection, as it helps to access data from different geographical locations without triggering anti-scraping mechanisms.
PyProxy’s real IP coverage is particularly strong in North America and Europe. The company claims a vast number of residential IPs across these regions, making it an excellent choice for users focused on these markets. Additionally, PyProxy supports a wide range of IP types, including rotating IPs and sticky IPs, giving users flexibility in how they manage their proxy usage.
However, in less populated regions, PyProxy’s coverage may not be as extensive. For users needing residential proxies in more remote or developing regions, the IP pool may be limited, which can affect the success of geo-targeted tasks.
USAProxy Real IP Coverage
USAProxy, as the name suggests, focuses heavily on providing proxies from the United States. It offers a wide range of real IP addresses across various states and cities, making it ideal for users looking to perform region-specific tasks within the U.S. For businesses conducting market research or looking to scrape data from U.S.-based websites, USAProxy’s service can offer an edge.
The real IP coverage of USAProxy is robust within the United States, with a large volume of IPs available in major metropolitan areas. However, the service does not provide as much international coverage as PyProxy. If your primary focus is U.S. data or you need to access geo-restricted content within the U.S., USAProxy is a strong choice. On the flip side, users with international needs might find the service less versatile.
Factors Affecting Real IP Coverage
The real IP coverage of a residential proxy service is influenced by several factors. These include the number of residential IPs in the network, the geographic diversity of those IPs, and how frequently the IPs are rotated. Let’s explore these factors in more detail.
Number of Residential IPs
The number of residential IPs in a proxy network directly impacts its real IP coverage. More IPs mean greater diversity, which is essential for tasks like web scraping and market research. A larger IP pool reduces the chances of overuse and helps maintain anonymity. Both PyProxy and USAProxy boast large networks, but the exact number of IPs available in each service is not always publicly disclosed.
Geographic Diversity of IPs
The geographic spread of IPs is crucial for tasks that require accessing region-specific content. For example, if you are scraping websites for pricing data from multiple countries, you’ll need proxies from different regions to avoid detection. PyProxy excels in offering a diverse range of IPs across continents, while USAProxy focuses more on U.S.-based IPs, making it a better fit for U.S.-centric operations.
IP Rotation and Sticky IPs
Another important factor in real IP coverage is how frequently the proxy ips are rotated. Some services offer rotating IPs, where the IP address changes periodically to simulate different users. Others provide sticky IPs, where the user maintains the same IP for a longer period, which is useful for maintaining session persistence. Both PyProxy and USAProxy offer these options, but users should choose based on their specific needs—whether they need dynamic IPs for anonymity or static IPs for session consistency.
Reliability and Performance
While real IP coverage is an important consideration, the reliability and performance of the proxy network are just as critical. A large number of IPs doesn’t mean much if the proxies are slow or unreliable. Both PyProxy and USAProxy offer varying degrees of performance, depending on the user’s location and task requirements.
PyProxy Performance
PyProxy’s network is known for being relatively stable and fast, especially in well-covered regions like North America and Europe. The service offers high-speed connections for users performing time-sensitive tasks such as web scraping or market research. However, in areas with fewer residential IPs, users may experience slower speeds or more frequent IP bans, which could affect performance.
USAProxy Performance
Since USAProxy focuses primarily on U.S. IPs, the performance of its service is typically more reliable within the U.S. The network is optimized for U.S. traffic, ensuring good speeds and fewer disruptions. However, users outside the U.S. may experience slower speeds or less stable connections, especially if they need to access data from U.S. websites from abroad.
Conclusion: Which Proxy Service Should You Choose?
When comparing PyProxy and USAProxy, the choice depends largely on the user’s needs. If your primary requirement is access to a wide variety of real IPs from around the world, PyProxy is the better option. Its extensive network across multiple continents makes it suitable for users needing global coverage.
On the other hand, if you are focused on U.S.-centric tasks, such as scraping U.S.-based websites or performing market research within the U.S., USAProxy provides a more tailored solution. Its robust real IP coverage in the U.S. ensures that users can access reliable data without much risk of detection or blocking.
Ultimately, both services have their strengths. PyProxy offers better global coverage, while USAProxy is the best option for those focused solely on U.S. data. Your decision should be based on where you need to operate and the specific tasks you need to complete.
