When it comes to choosing a static proxy for web scraping or anonymous browsing, two prominent tools in the market are decodo and PYPROXY. Both offer static proxy services with unique features that cater to different user needs. However, the question that often arises is: which one provides higher availability? Proxy availability is crucial in ensuring seamless operation, and the choice between decodo and pyproxy can significantly impact the performance of your tasks. This article delves into a detailed comparison of these two static proxy services, highlighting their strengths and weaknesses in terms of availability, reliability, and overall usability.
Before diving into the specifics of decodo and pyproxy, it’s essential to understand the concept of proxy availability. Proxy availability refers to the uptime or reliability of a proxy server, which dictates how often the proxy can be accessed and used for tasks such as web scraping, data collection, or browsing. High availability ensures that users do not experience downtime or interruptions during their activities, which is especially critical for businesses relying on continuous data extraction.
In the context of static proxies, which remain the same over time, availability is even more critical because users require stable and consistent access to the same proxy ips. Therefore, the tool or service chosen should have robust mechanisms in place to maintain high availability, ensuring smooth, uninterrupted operation.
Both decodo and pyproxy are popular choices for static proxy services, offering different sets of features and functionalities. To help users decide which tool provides higher availability, let’s examine their core features.
decodo: decodo is known for its versatility and simplicity in integrating with different web scraping frameworks. It offers a range of features, including IP rotation, proxy authentication, and integration with popular scraping libraries. Its focus is on providing a reliable and scalable proxy service, although it may not always offer the highest proxy uptime across all regions.
pyproxy: pyproxy, on the other hand, emphasizes high availability and fast connection speeds. It provides users with high-performance static proxies that are optimized for reliability and uptime. pyproxy's static proxies are designed to support continuous use, making it an appealing option for users who need constant access to the same IPs.
To evaluate which of the two services offers better proxy availability, we need to consider several factors:
1. Server Infrastructure and Global Reach
decodo and pyproxy both claim to have large-scale server infrastructures designed to ensure high availability. However, the quality of these infrastructures can vary greatly depending on their global coverage.

- decodo: decodo operates through a network of servers located in various regions. While it provides relatively good global coverage, the availability of proxies in certain regions can sometimes be inconsistent. Users in less popular regions may experience slower speeds or intermittent downtime.
- pyproxy: pyproxy stands out in terms of its global reach and server density. It has a larger network of high-performance servers across multiple countries, making it more reliable in terms of proxy availability. For users who need stable, high-quality static proxies, pyproxy’s infrastructure tends to offer better uptime and fewer interruptions.
2. Proxy Rotation and Pool Management
Both decodo and pyproxy provide static proxies, but their management of proxy pools and rotation mechanisms may differ. Proxy rotation helps ensure that users have access to fresh IPs without experiencing overuse or blockages. Static proxies are generally not rotated as frequently, but the quality of the pool management system is still critical.
- decodo: While decodo allows users to rotate IPs manually, it might not offer the same level of automation in managing proxy pools. This means that users need to monitor the health of proxies more closely, which could impact availability during high-demand periods.
- pyproxy: pyproxy offers a more robust proxy pool management system. Its proxy infrastructure is designed to provide users with consistent, uninterrupted access to static proxies, with fewer instances of IP bans or downtime. This makes pyproxy a more reliable option in terms of availability, especially for continuous tasks.
3. Service Monitoring and Support
Another key factor in determining proxy availability is the level of monitoring and support that the service offers. Both decodo and pyproxy provide customer support, but the quality and responsiveness of this support can impact how quickly issues are resolved when proxy availability is affected.
- decodo: decodo’s support team is generally responsive, but some users report slower resolution times when there are availability issues. This can affect overall uptime, especially if proxies experience extended downtime before they are fixed.
- pyproxy: pyproxy offers 24/7 customer support with proactive monitoring of proxy servers. If an issue arises with proxy availability, pyproxy’s team tends to address it quickly, minimizing downtime and ensuring that users can maintain continuous access to their proxies.

Proxy availability is not just about uptime; it also involves speed and latency. The faster the connection, the less likely users are to encounter interruptions due to slow proxy speeds.
- decodo: Users of decodo generally report decent speeds, but it can sometimes be slower depending on the server region and load. This may lead to occasional lags, particularly during peak hours or if the proxies are overused.
- pyproxy: pyproxy tends to outperform decodo in terms of connection speed and latency. Its proxies are optimized for performance, offering faster connection times and more stable speeds even during peak demand.
Based on the factors discussed, pyproxy emerges as the more reliable option in terms of static proxy availability. Its expansive server network, robust proxy pool management, and proactive customer support make it a strong contender for users who prioritize uptime and stability.
While decodo offers a solid proxy service, its global reach and infrastructure might not match the performance of pyproxy, especially for users in need of continuous, high-availability proxies. Therefore, if your primary concern is ensuring consistent and uninterrupted proxy service, pyproxy is the better choice for higher availability.